Beware The Company You Keep

September 6, 2010

We all know the words of wisdom that state that you should beware the company you keep. The company you keep is a reflection of yourself because birds of a feather flock together. However, even after you rid yourself of all friends or acquaintances with questionable character, you still have to worry about what others may think about your family. After all, fruit doesn’t fall far from the tree, or so they say.

If you thought that this was a hot topic before the rise of the Web 2.0, you must think it’s blazin’ right now.

I recently read a blog post related to this topic. Unfortunately, I can’t find it now and I can’t remember exact details, but I think that the generalities will do just fine.

The girl who wrote this post was a freelancer or contractor, and a client had asked her to build a Facebook fan page. This girl had two Facebook accounts, one for personal use and one for professional use. The client wanted 20 or so people to “like” the site, so she asked her personal Facebook friends to like the page. The client saw the profile picture of one of its fans, was offended by what he saw (I believe it was a picture of a girl getting wasted drunk, but it may have been something sexual), and wanted to know how the girl became a fan of his business. It turns out that the girl with the offensive profile picture was a friend of the girl who built the Facebook fan page. Ouch.

Now, the girl who built the page was in the wrong. She had created two Facebook accounts so that she could deliberately separate her professional and personal contacts, yet when a client wanted 20 or so fans for its own page, she jumped across the boundary she had set up and asked her personal contacts to help with a professional task. She had set up two accounts for a reason; she shouldn’t have forgotten that.

But the more and more I think about this incident, I wonder if the client may have freaked out. After all, you can’t really control who is your “fan”. Maybe you can control which of your fans people can see on Facebook (I’m not sure if you can), but you can’t control who’s talking about you on Facebook or Twitter or on their own blogs.

This is the double-edge sword of online transparency.

The plus side of online transparency is that you know who you’re doing business with. You better know who’s on the other side of the transaction.

The negative side of online transparency is…that you know who you’re doing business with. You better know who’s on the other side of the transaction.

Online transparency may help with weeding out questionable characters when you’re looking for a new employee to represent your company, but it also shows who you’re doing business with.

I think that, if you sell a product or service that may be used by virtually anyone, you may have to accept the fact that you have done business with alcoholics and the promiscuous and people with other characteristics that you may not have favored in the past. If all that you required of others in the past was that they had the means to afford your service or product, why you should start demanding more now? Is that all of a sudden going to change now that we have the means to easily learn more about the average joe than we had before?

Is it realistic to expect people to have a clean slate of friends? We accept this rule about bewaring the company you keep, but then we get offended at the notion of the judgment of others. I’m a dreamer, but I’m not naive enough to believe that others will suddenly stop judging.

The point is, I’m sure that all of us have at LEAST one contact that could turn others off because, after all, you never know what’s going to turn someone off. Profanity, vulgarity, promiscuity, drug use, religious views, political views, what fraternity someone was in — every single one of those topics has the potential to upset someone. And now, thanks to Facebook, every single one of those topics can be shared with the click of a mouse.

If I associated only with people who were just like me and consistently shared my morals and ideals and philosophies, I’d have one friend and one friend only. That’s a damn lonely existence. I always thought that my willingness to overlook certain “flaws” in people and to get along with as many different types of people as possible was a strength. But, if people continue to freak out over little details, I have to second guess how others may perceive the connections I’ve made in the past.

Also, if you don’t have that one friend that others would claim to be ashamed of, chances are that you’re just not aware of it yet. And you’re only one profile picture or status update away from finding out.

While you’re worrying about who your business is associating with now that social media has changed business, so are your competitors. And everyone else. Because they’re just as powerless as you are.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
  • Pingback: Jake LaCaze

  • http://melissacooley.com/ Melissa

    Wow, Jake — this is a great post!

    As the saying goes: “You can’t please all the people all the time.” There’s no doubt that there’s going to be *someone* who doesn’t like at least one of your friends. Or they don’t like the company that your friend keeps, which still reflects badly on you (after all, if your friend shows poor judgment in consorting with all sorts of characters, why are you friends with someone who makes those kinds of choices?)

    The reality is that it’s just a bunch of silly nonsense — to judge a person based on anything external to the person is misguided. They should focus on what is in front of them in terms of abilities, actions, and character.

    A commentary on that post you reference here — the first thing I thought was “The client asked the freelancer to get the page liked by 20 or so people?” That seems rather deceptive to pretend that the bandwagon has solid beginnings when it’s merely held together with rubber bands and scotch tape. No, the freelancer shouldn’t have done what she did, but IMO neither should the client.

  • Pingback: Melissa Cooley

  • Pingback: Jake LaCaze

  • City Sylvester

    You made some good points, and I agree “That is a damn lonely existence” when you only hang out with people who share your exact thoughts and belief systems.

  • Pingback: City Sylvester

  • http://jorgensundberg.net Jorgen Sundberg

    Sleep with dogs and you shall wake up with fleas as they say… And fly with the eagles instead of scratching round with the turkeys as others say :-)

    One suggestion for you Jake; headers in your posts. You write fairly long posts and subheaders make it easier for the eye to read. Just my 2 cents!!

  • Pingback: Tenika Luke

  • Anonymous

    I’ve come to find out that my company is kept and desired by only certain types of people usually. Finance companies tend to avoid me because I’m not straight laced, I have a potty mouth and don’t dress up unless I absolutely have to. Boulder’s cool because business meetings are usually attended in shorts and flip flops and people don’t judge you if you’re not wearing a button up. It’s just like, let’s focus on ideas and not the image of the source of them.

    However, if there’s money involved, I might just throw on a tie and go into “good friend” mode for just about anyone. Just sayin….

Previous post:

Next post: